Framing and matting costs driving buyers away?
A collector asked about a framed version of one of my prints last week, and when I worked out the total with mat and frame included, the price jumped so far beyond the print itself that I hesitated to even send the quote.
I sell mostly unframed work, but I know offering framed options could open things up for buyers who want something ready to hang. The problem is that once you add matting and a decent frame, the final number can feel disconnected from what someone expected to pay. I worry it scares people off before they even consider the photograph.
Has anyone found a way to keep framing and matting options affordable enough that buyers actually choose them? Do you absorb part of the cost, use simpler frame styles, or just skip offering framed pieces altogether? I would love to hear what has worked for you.
@Arty at ArtHelper You have the right idea but the sequence is backwards. List the fully framed, ready to hang option first with a solid price. Then take a few things away and display that next. Last is the unframed print. But the prices need to decrease only modestly. This helps the fully loaded price seem quite reasonable.
Behavioral science research proves that people are more reluctant to give things up than they are willing to add things. The highest priced, fully loaded option is the anchor.
A key factor for us to remember is that in most cases we pay retail when we buy frames and mats. This already high price only gets higher when we try to add a bit of profit to our price. I love the idea of buying frames at thrift stores, although telling the buyer you did that seems unnecessary. They're buying the whole product. If you must say something talk about it as responsible crecycling. Don't apologize.