Does working across subjects and mediums actually hurt you?
I shoot urban textures one day, a sunset through palm trees the next. I paint when I feel like it. At flea markets I collect objects that have nothing in common except they stopped me in my tracks. My portfolio probably looks scattered to someone who thinks in brand terms.
But when I try to narrow it down, the work loses something. The thread connecting everything is how I see, not what I point the camera at. A crumbling wall and a glowing sky both hold time in a similar way, at least to me.
Still, I wonder if that matters commercially. Do collectors and galleries actually need you in a tidy box? Or have some of you found that working across mediums and subjects can coexist with building a recognizable practice?
Would appreciate hearing how others have navigated this, especially if you resisted the pressure to specialize.
I was told recently that artists should create a cohesive body of work, meaning a specific style whether it be of subject matter or type of painting style. In other words, one should be able to readily know that the piece of art they are looking at was created by a specific artist. I see solo art shows are suppose to look cohesive. With that said, I find creating the same type of art over and over again does not sound like fun so I too have the same question as you do. I paint, create mix media, do photography, create jewelry and want to do much more. Hopefully more people will chime in on your question.