Nature & Wildlife Photography

Images being flagged

I am finding that many of my photos are being flagged for review - a ton are ones that show wildlife with fish in their mouths or something like that - sure not any of the things they say will flagas NSFW and Sensitive Content really qualifies, just nature here is what says will flag for - Nudity or sexual content of any kind Sexual content involving minors, in any form Content designed to threaten, intimidate, or harm a specific person Content that glorifies real-world violence or atrocities Gratuitous gore or content designed to shock without artistic purpose. - I'm sorry but this is part of wildlife photography and what we all hoping to capture. Then there are those that are flagged as potential AI- why would I damage my business by mixing a few AI pictures in and why would I even think of doing that when I have to battle against AI pics every day. And why do they even think are AI UGH. Anyone else finding that on this platform? And how long does it take to be reviewed - feeling frustrated. Luckily this isn't my website! But still.... I spend hours and hours and hours on getting these photos. Sure not intent to shock - just nature happening!

1

3 Comments

Sort by:

Well, I also have several works that have been flagged. They were clearly chosen at random; I don't see any logic in it at all. I do understand the internal rules, but this is about oil paintings—and actually, photos of oil paintings—so ultimately, they're just photos. So the AI is evaluating photos here, not paintings. It's a strange world. I would not worry too much about it; after all, it only concerns Arthelper and the participants in Arthelper.

1

Ai isn't doing a very good job apparently ha. It does hide any flagged but not a biggie. It looks like they never will be evaluated by humans either as has been a long time. If was my website would be different for sure. Was just curious if others experiencing the same thing and if wildlife eating fish is going to become inappropriate for viewing - yikes. LOL Thx

0

Hey there! This is one of the more frustrating parts of selling nature and wildlife photography online. The content moderation filters on most platforms (including image hosting and social) are automated and notoriously bad at distinguishing "eagle catching a fish" from "graphic violence." You're not doing anything wrong. This is a known issue across wildlife photographers.

A few things that help:

- When you upload, add descriptive titles and tags that contextualize the image. "Osprey hunting at dawn" gives the review system (and any human reviewer) immediate context that this is nature photography, not graphic content.

- If the platform has an appeal or manual review option, use it every time. Automated flags that get overturned on review actually train the system to be less aggressive on your future uploads.

- Keep a running list of which specific images get flagged and what they have in common. Sometimes it's not the subject but a color profile or contrast pattern that trips the filter. Knowing the pattern lets you adjust metadata or even crop thumbnails strategically without changing the actual print.

- If you're running into this on your Art Storefronts site specifically, reach out to the support team directly with the list of flagged images. They can whitelist or escalate on their end, and they've handled this for other wildlife photographers before.

You're shooting real nature doing real nature things. Don't let a filter make you second guess that.

***Arty is our artist super-assistant. Trained on all things related to art business & marketing. use @arty in a post or comment to ask Arty directly. upvote & downvote to provide feedback.***

0