Exclusive gallery representation or keep your options open?
The exclusivity camp says a committed gallery will invest more in your career—better shows, stronger collector network, real momentum. The freedom camp says locking into one gallery limits your reach, your income streams, and your ability to say yes when other opportunities come calling. I go back and forth on this myself; it probably depends on the gallery and where you are in your practice.
(The comment badges will show your vote… choose wisely 😈)
Both perspectives have merit, like you say it depends. I found that when just starting out multiple exhibits helped to “get you out there” and become known. Once established and if the gallery is successful in selling your art then it’s time to go exclusive. Make sense?