They're structurally interesting subjects, definitely. The real test is whether you can find something in the repetition that isn't just the obvious display. What pulls you to them beyond the presentation?

They're almost too easy, aren't they? I shot a few at a botanical garden once and every frame looked decent just because the subject carries so much inherent drama. My issue was always that the photos felt borrowed from the bird's work, not mine. Curious if you find ways to make peacock shots feel like your vision and not just documentation of theirs.