Art Business

Galleries Are Using AI to Write Their Emails — But Won't Hang AI Art on Their Walls

57% of galleries are using AI to write their emails right now. To draft press releases, plan exhibitions, manage invoices.

But only 9% think AI art is a legitimate medium.

Artsy just published the first major industry survey on AI — over 300 gallery professionals — and the results are... honestly kind of wild.

Here's what they found:

Galleries love AI as a tool.

57% use it for communications. 24% for research. 20% for scheduling and operations. It's running the back office of the art world and nobody's talking about it.

But galleries hate AI as art.

25% call it a "destabilizing force." 28% say its market value is "unclear." Only 9% — nine percent — consider AI-generated art a legitimate new medium.

Collectors aren't asking for it either.

41% of galleries say AI "rarely comes up" with collectors. 16% say their collectors actively avoid AI art. That's not indifference. That's rejection.

And artists? They're mostly not touching it.

61% of galleries say none of their artists use AI in their practice. Among those who do, it's rendering, visualization, research — production tools, not creative ones.

Here's the part that gets interesting though.

36% of galleries think AI will eventually become an "established artmaking tool" — like photography. Remember, photography went through the exact same cycle. "It's not real art." Then it was everywhere. Then it was in every museum on earth.

So what are we actually watching here? An industry using AI with one hand and pushing it away with the other.

The question for working artists is simple: your galleries are already using AI behind the scenes. Your competitors might be using it to produce faster. But collectors don't want it yet.

So where do YOU draw the line? Are you using AI anywhere in your workflow — even for admin stuff like writing bios or editing photos? Or are you staying completely hands-off?

No wrong answer. But it's a conversation worth having, because this survey makes one thing clear: the art world hasn't figured this out yet either.

Source: Artsy, "The Artsy AI Survey 2026" — survey of 300+ gallery professionals, published March 18, 2026

2

5 Comments

Sort by:
della rae createsMar 22, 2026
Hi Patrick. This might be the wrong place to reach out, but I have a couple of questions.
First, I'm a new member, living in Australia, so I'm in the wrong zone for most Zoom calls, which is disappointing.

I've listened to recordings and appreciate them, but am I missing something important? I do really enjoy face to face.

Where do I catch up on all I need to know?

Also, I've had someone reach through Arthelper, inviting me to participate in NFTs. I'm doubtful about these. What do you think?

Thanks in advance for your help.

Della
0
della rae createsMar 22, 2026
Thank you Patrick - and I just wanted to clarify that it's AI's descriptions of my artwork and my process, that I'm referring to. I'm still all in favour of human made art and with AI as a support structure behind the scenes. I'm sure Arty won't take that personally!
0
Patrick ShanahanMar 22, 2026
100% Della. No need for clarification as your original point was totally clear. Not anti Ai at all just pro human.

Artists need help in a massive amount of areas and Ai can help in a great many of them.

The work must get out and get seen!
0
della rae createsMar 21, 2026
As a new member to Artstorefronts, I began having little appreciation, or time for AI, but having just started putting up artwork and reading the descriptions it comes up with, I know I could not do better. It seems to know me better than I know myself, which is a little bit disconcerting, but not a negative thing.
0
Patrick ShanahanMar 21, 2026
Important discovery Della and totally ok. Its just a tool and if it helps artists get their art out there we are all for leaning into it.... just not creating the art itself!
0